Families' Anguish Regarding Shoreline Erosion Threatening Norfolk Burial Sites
Loved ones whose relatives laid to rest in graves vulnerable to coastal erosion argue that a lack of decision over how to tackle the problem is creating avoidable anguish about the eternal homes of their departed family.
A Looming Danger to Historic Graveyards
The council have identified three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being engulfed by the ocean in the next few generations.
A recent report on the situation sets out a series of options, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and reburying them in more secure locations. Officials say it is for the community to decide how to move forward.
“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. My parents wanted this to serve as their final resting place, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”
Projections indicate at least part of one churchyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.
Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles
One resident recalled a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the water, including its church and graveyard.
“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that the deceased will just get washed out to the ocean. They won’t. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go grave robbing in search of valuables. That is completely disrespectful.”
“I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the shore. I’d be appalled by that.”
A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Peril
Along the shoreline is situated the burial plot of a former paratrooper who died while serving overseas. His mother said she could not sleep after learning her child's grave might one day be relocated.
“It truly trouble me to consider this won’t be his lasting resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an important site to visit.”
In her view, new burials should cease but says it is too soon to exhume existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an early decision must be made when a tipping point has been reached.”
Searching for Solutions and Certainty
The lack of consensus over when and how to handle the problem has resulted in grieving relatives feeling exasperated and worried.
Some want additional sea defences to slow the inevitable erosion and to allow burials to continue for now. Different voices contend the moment for moving graves is approaching.
“It is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The official study was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And everybody is washing their hands over who is responsible.”
A local official confirmed the burial sites were under the care of the church authorities. “In the end it is up to them to decide the direction to take. We are here to help support them through that journey with communities.”
He added there was ample time to consider all the choices. “We are talking many years before it starts to be lost.”
“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should happen yet. It requires productive local conversations to find the appropriate answers for each village.”
The prospect of the loss of the historic sites was described as one of “immense sadness for the local community,” but faith leaders also spoke of a belief in resurrection, providing a spiritual viewpoint on the physical loss of sacred ground.